Monday 22 April 2013

A response to a 'Girls-Only area'.

FYI: Heywood Jablome hasn’t been posting on this blog due to a fit of rage typing out his posts. Doctors have diagnosed him with Internetwarrioritus, and have prescribed him with Valium; lots and lots of wonderful Valium. Here is his return to the blog.

As we have seen from Hugh G. Rection (stealing my area of posting, tw*t), The Trash has obtained using a reliable source (Chinese child slaves sorting through shredded documents), a copy of some School Council minutes. In this, we see “Designated girls only area suggested” Really? Surely this is sexist, and against the Human Rights of a Child that the school seem to love so much.

But if the school have even allowed this to be considered, what about a Boys’ only area? Where the wonders of Tits and Porn can be discussed without the fear of oppression by Feminists (hey, a Teenage boy has got to do what a Teenage boy has got to do). 

NOTE: THIS IS A JOKE. LIGHTEN UP. THIS SUGGESTION IS JUST AS DAFT AS THE ORIGINAL ONE. 

Or a corner for Transsexuals (pre or post-Op, we're not one to judge). Or for Gay people. Or Lesbians. Or Goths. Or Bieber fans (hopefully that would be gated and locked).

The point I'm trying to make is that this isn't a school, or a country, that promotes separation. We promote equality. The fact that this was allowed to be tabled is an outrage. What kind of 'Rights Respecting School' is this when someone can propose an area for one gender only? Do we want to go back to the days of Segregation like the 1960s USA we read about in History Textbooks? 


No. No one does. So don't allow the Democratic People's Republic Of School Council to even think of something like this again.




DISCLAIMER: This Hampstead Trash article has been written to critique the actions of the governing bodies of the school. This is so student readers can hear both sides of the argument, and formulate their own opinions on matters pertaining to their education.